red fox: has physical part whiskers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part whiskers 1.00
have whiskers on legs 0.92
has physical part teeth 0.84
has physical part tails 0.82
has physical part claws 0.81
has physical part legs 0.81
has physical part ears 0.81
has physical part tail 0.80
have bushy tails 0.78
has physical part noses 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part ears)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tail)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part noses)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part claws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part ears)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tail)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part ears)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tail)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)