red fox: have bushy tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bushy tails 1.00
have bushy tail 0.96
have long tails 0.82
have whiskers on legs 0.82
have big tails 0.81
has physical part tails 0.79
has physical part whiskers 0.78
have pointy ears 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have big tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fox, have big tails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(arctic fox, have big tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red panda, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tails)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tails)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, have long tails)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(red fox, have big tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(red fox, have big tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have big tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(fox, have big tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)