red fox: have whiskers on legs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have whiskers on legs 1.00
has physical part whiskers 0.92
have long legs 0.85
has physical part legs 0.82
have bushy tails 0.82
have bushy tail 0.80
have pointy ears 0.79
has physical part tails 0.78
have long tails 0.77
have sharp teeth 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(fox, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(fox, have bushy tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(fox, have long tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(fox, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(fox, have long tails)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(fox, have bushy tails)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have long tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(arctic fox, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(fox, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(mammal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part whiskers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(red squirrel, have bushy tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(red panda, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(red panda, have long tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red panda, have long tails)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(red squirrel, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part whiskers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long legs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have long tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(red fox, have sharp teeth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(red fox, have pointy ears)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part tails)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tail)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long legs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(red fox, have bushy tails)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(red fox, have long legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(red fox, have long legs)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red fox, have long tails)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(red fox, have long tails)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(red fox, have long tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part whiskers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(red panda, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(red squirrel, have bushy tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red panda, have long tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part legs)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part tails)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mammal, has physical part tails)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(fox, has physical part tails)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(arctic fox, have bushy tails)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(fox, have bushy tails)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fox, have long tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part whiskers)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(red fox, have whiskers on legs) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)