red fox: is invasive species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is invasive species 1.00
is invasive 0.94
be invasive species in australia 0.93
is species 0.89
has state pests 0.76
live in deciduous forests 0.76
is endangered 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(species, is invasive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fox, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(species, is invasive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fox, has state pests)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fox, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(species, is invasive)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fox, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fox, has state pests)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(gray fox, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, is species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(species, is invasive)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(fox, has state pests)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(arctic fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(brown bear, is species)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(brown bear, is species)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red squirrel, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(red panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(red panda, is endangered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(gray fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(gray fox, is endangered)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(brown bear, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(brown bear, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive species)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(red fox, is species)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(red fox, is species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red fox, is species)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has state pests)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(red fox, has state pests)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(red fox, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red fox, be invasive species in australia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(red fox, has state pests)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(red fox, has state pests)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(species, is invasive)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fox, has state pests)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brown bear, is species)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, is endangered)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(gray fox, is endangered)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(brown bear, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(species, is invasive)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(arctic fox, is endangered)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(fox, has state pests)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fox, is endangered)