red fox: live in deciduous forests

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fox
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.72
, arctic fox
Weight: 0.71
, species
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.67
Siblings red squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, gray fox
Weight: 0.39
, red panda
Weight: 0.38
, brown bear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in deciduous forests 1.00
live in forests 0.90
is species 0.78
live in taiga 0.76
is invasive species 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fox, live in forests)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fox, live in forests)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(brown bear, is species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fox, live in forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(brown bear, is species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(brown bear, is species)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(red fox, is species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(red fox, is invasive species)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red fox, is species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red fox, live in forests)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(red fox, live in taiga)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in forests)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in taiga)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(red fox, is invasive species)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in taiga)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red fox, live in taiga)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(red fox, live in forests)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(red fox, is species)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(red fox, live in forests)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(red fox, is invasive species)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is invasive species)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is species)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, live in forests)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(brown bear, is species)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(red fox, live in deciduous forests) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(fox, live in forests)