red panda: be r in endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be r in endangered 1.00
be in endangered 0.90
be endangered 0.90
is endangered 0.89
get endangered 0.88
become endangered 0.86
be endangered in india 0.85
is endangered species 0.84
is endangered animals 0.84
be on endangered list 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(monkey, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(giant panda, is endangered species)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(giant panda, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(giant panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(giant panda, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(endangered species, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(giant panda, become endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is endangered animals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is endangered species)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(monkey, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, become endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is endangered)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is endangered animals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is endangered species)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monkey, is endangered)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(endangered species, is endangered)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, become endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, become endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered species)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, be on endangered list)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(monkey, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(giant panda, is endangered species)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(giant panda, be endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(giant panda, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(endangered species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(giant panda, is endangered animals)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(giant panda, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(komodo dragon, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, is endangered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(red squirrel, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(red fox, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(red fox, is endangered)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(komodo dragon, become endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, become endangered)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is endangered)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(panda bear, is endangered species)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is endangered species)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(panda bear, be on endangered list)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(panda bear, be on endangered list)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(red panda, be in endangered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(red panda, be endangered)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(red panda, is endangered)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(red panda, get endangered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(red panda, be in endangered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(red panda, be endangered in india)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(red panda, become endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(red panda, be in endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(red panda, is endangered species)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, is endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(red panda, is endangered animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(red panda, is endangered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(red panda, be endangered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(red panda, get endangered)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be endangered in india)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(red panda, be on endangered list)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(red panda, is endangered species)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(red panda, get endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(red panda, become endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red panda, become endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(red panda, be endangered in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red panda, is endangered animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(red panda, be on endangered list)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red panda, be endangered in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(red panda, get endangered)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(red panda, is endangered species)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(red panda, is endangered animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(red panda, become endangered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(red panda, be on endangered list)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be in endangered)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is endangered animals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is endangered species)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be on endangered list)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(endangered species, is endangered)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(giant panda, become endangered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered animals)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered species)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monkey, is endangered)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, become endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(panda bear, be on endangered list)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(panda bear, is endangered species)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red squirrel, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(red fox, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(panda bear, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(endangered species, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(giant panda, be endangered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(giant panda, become endangered)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered animals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(giant panda, is endangered species)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(monkey, is endangered)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(red panda, be r in endangered)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, become endangered)