red panda: be related to pandas

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to pandas 1.00
be called pandas 0.97
be related to giant pandas 0.96
be called red pandas 0.95
be called lesser pandas 0.92
is panda 0.88
be called panda 0.87
be called red panda 0.85
is zoo 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(giant panda, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to pandas)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(giant panda, is zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, is zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(giant panda, be called pandas)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, is zoo)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(giant panda, be called pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(giant panda, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panda bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is zoo)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(komodo dragon, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, is zoo)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(red panda, be related to pandas)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(red panda, be called pandas)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(red panda, be called pandas)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called pandas)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, is panda)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(red panda, be called panda)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to giant pandas)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called pandas)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, be called red panda)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(red panda, be related to giant pandas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red panda, is panda)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called red pandas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called lesser pandas)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(red panda, is panda)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(red panda, be called lesser pandas)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(red panda, be called panda)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called panda)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called red panda)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(red panda, be called red panda)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is panda)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called panda)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be called red panda)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is zoo)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to giant pandas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(red panda, be called lesser pandas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(red panda, is zoo)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(red panda, be called lesser pandas)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to giant pandas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red panda, is zoo)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(red panda, is zoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to pandas)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(giant panda, is zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, is zoo)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panda bear, is zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(giant panda, be called pandas)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(red panda, be related to pandas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(giant panda, is zoo)