red panda: be related to raccoons

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to raccoons 1.00
look like raccoons 0.94
look like foxes 0.78
is animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to raccoons)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.00
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, is animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, is animals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, is animals)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(red panda, be related to raccoons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(red panda, be related to raccoons)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red panda, look like raccoons)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red panda, look like raccoons)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(red panda, look like raccoons)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(red panda, look like raccoons)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(red panda, look like foxes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red panda, is animals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(red panda, look like foxes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(red panda, look like foxes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(red panda, look like foxes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(red panda, is animals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(red panda, is animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red panda, is animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to raccoons)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(red panda, be related to raccoons)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(red panda, be related to raccoons)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(animal, is animals)