red panda: have big ears

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have big ears 1.00
has physical part ears 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red fox, have big ears)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(red fox, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(red fox, have big ears)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(red fox, has physical part ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red fox, has physical part ears)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(red panda, have big ears)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have big ears)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red panda, have big ears)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(red fox, has physical part ears)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(red panda, have big ears) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(red fox, have big ears)