red panda: live in groups

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents giant panda
Weight: 0.80
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, endangered species
Weight: 0.66
, creature
Weight: 0.62
, monkey
Weight: 0.60
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.39
, red fox
Weight: 0.38
, red squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in groups 1.00
live in himalayas 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(red panda, live in groups)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in himalayas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red panda, live in himalayas)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in groups)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(red panda, live in groups)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(red panda, live in groups)