red squirrel: be in decline

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, bird
Weight: 0.71
, mammal
Weight: 0.69
, rodent
Weight: 0.66
, animal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.40
, squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, blue bird
Weight: 0.39
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in decline 1.00
decline in uk 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, decline in uk)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(blue bird, be in decline)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(blue bird, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(blue bird, be in decline)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(squirrel, decline in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(squirrel, decline in uk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(red squirrel, be in decline)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(red squirrel, decline in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(red squirrel, decline in uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(red squirrel, decline in uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, decline in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be in decline)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(red squirrel, be in decline)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(blue bird, be in decline)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, be in decline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(squirrel, decline in uk)