red squirrel: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents species
Weight: 0.72
, bird
Weight: 0.71
, mammal
Weight: 0.69
, rodent
Weight: 0.66
, animal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings red fox
Weight: 0.40
, squirrel
Weight: 0.40
, blue bird
Weight: 0.39
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38
, fox
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(red fox, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(red fox, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(red fox, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(red squirrel, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(red squirrel, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(peregrine falcon, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(red squirrel, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(red fox, has quality bad)