red wine: be better than beer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents white wine
Weight: 0.89
, wine
Weight: 0.79
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.68
Siblings burgundy
Weight: 0.60
, claret
Weight: 0.56
, grape juice
Weight: 0.37
, madeira
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than beer 1.00
be healthier than beer 0.92
be better than wine 0.89
be better than white wine 0.86
be healthier than wine 0.84
be healthier than white wine 0.83
be more expensive than white wine 0.82
have higher proof than white wine 0.80
be better than white 0.79
need bigger glass 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be better than white wine)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than white)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(wine, be better than white wine)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(food, be better than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than beer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than beer)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white wine)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wine, be better than white)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(food, be better than white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be better than white wine)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(wine, be healthier than white wine)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(food, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wine, be healthier than beer)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(wine, be better than white)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(red wine, be better than beer)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than beer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(red wine, be healthier than beer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than beer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than beer)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(red wine, be better than white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(red wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(red wine, have higher proof than white wine)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white wine)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than wine)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(red wine, be healthier than wine)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than wine)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than wine)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be healthier than wine)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(red wine, be healthier than wine)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(red wine, be better than wine)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(red wine, be healthier than wine)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than beer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be better than beer)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than beer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white wine)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be better than beer)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than beer)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be better than white wine)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(wine, be healthier than white wine)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(wine, be more expensive than white wine)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(red wine, be better than beer)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, be better than white)