red: be better than blue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents red wine
Weight: 0.70
, color
Weight: 0.62
, hair color
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.61
Siblings orange
Weight: 0.65
, blue
Weight: 0.62
, burgundy
Weight: 0.55
, white wine
Weight: 0.38
, red line
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than blue 1.00
be darker than blue 0.89
has color blue 0.82
is blue colors 0.80
is blue popular colors 0.79
make purple 0.78
has color red 0.78
were yellow black green 0.77
is color red 0.77
be keep red 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(color, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(red, be better than blue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(color, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(red, be better than blue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(red wine, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(red, be better than blue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(red wine, has color red)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(color, has color red)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(color, has color blue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(color, has color blue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(color, has color red)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(red wine, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(orange, has color blue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue, has color blue)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(blue, make purple)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(blue, has color red)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(orange, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(color, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, be better than blue)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(color, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, be better than blue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(red wine, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, be better than blue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(blue, has color blue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(orange, has color blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(orange, has color blue)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(blue, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(blue, has color red)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(blue, make purple) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(blue, make purple)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(orange, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(orange, has color red)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red, be better than blue)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red, be darker than blue)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, be darker than blue)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be darker than blue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red, has color blue)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, has color blue)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, has color blue)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red, make purple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, make purple)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, make purple)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(red, be darker than blue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(red, has color blue)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(red, make purple)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(red, has color red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(red, has color red)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(red, has color red)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(red, has color red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(red, be better than blue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has color blue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red wine, has color red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(color, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(blue, has color blue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(orange, has color blue)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(blue, make purple)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(blue, has color red)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(orange, has color red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(red wine, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has color blue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(red, be better than blue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(color, has color red)