red: be better than white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents red wine
Weight: 0.70
, color
Weight: 0.62
, hair color
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.61
Siblings orange
Weight: 0.65
, blue
Weight: 0.62
, burgundy
Weight: 0.55
, white wine
Weight: 0.38
, red line
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than white 1.00
be better than green 0.88
make black 0.79
be hotter than violet 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red, be better than white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(orange, be better than green)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red, be better than white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(orange, be better than green) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(orange, be better than green)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(red, be better than white)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(red, be better than green)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(red, be better than green)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than green)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(red, make black)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(red, make black)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(red, make black)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(red, be better than green)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(red, be hotter than violet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(red, be hotter than violet)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(red, be hotter than violet)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(red, make black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red, be hotter than violet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(orange, be better than green)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(red, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)