red: be hotter than violet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents red wine
Weight: 0.70
, color
Weight: 0.62
, hair color
Weight: 0.61
, species
Weight: 0.61
Siblings orange
Weight: 0.65
, blue
Weight: 0.62
, burgundy
Weight: 0.55
, white wine
Weight: 0.38
, red line
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hotter than violet 1.00
be better than white 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red, be hotter than violet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(red wine, be better than white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(red wine, be better than white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(red wine, be better than white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(red, be hotter than violet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(red, be hotter than violet)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(red, be better than white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(red, be better than white)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(red, be better than white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(red, be better than white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(red, be hotter than violet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(red, be hotter than violet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(red, be hotter than violet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(red wine, be better than white)