redundancy: be important in genetic code

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings continuity
Weight: 0.31
, steve jobs
Weight: 0.31
, replication
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, automatic transmission
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in genetic code 1.00
be in genetic code important 1.00
be in genetic code 0.99
be in code important 0.87
be important in code 0.87
be in code 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in code)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in genetic code important)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in code important)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be in code)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in code)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in code)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in code)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be in genetic code important)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be important in code)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(redundancy, be important in code)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in code)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be in code important)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in genetic code important)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in genetic code important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in code important)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in code important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in genetic code)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code)