redundancy: be important in network

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings continuity
Weight: 0.31
, steve jobs
Weight: 0.31
, replication
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, automatic transmission
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in network 1.00
be important in business 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in network)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in network)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(integration, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be important in network)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be important in network)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(integration, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(integration, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(redundancy, be important in network)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(redundancy, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be important in business)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in network)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(integration, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(redundancy, be important in network) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)