redundancy: be in code important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.59
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings continuity
Weight: 0.31
, steve jobs
Weight: 0.31
, replication
Weight: 0.31
, integration
Weight: 0.31
, automatic transmission
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in code important 1.00
be important in code 1.00
be in code 0.97
be important in genetic code 0.87
be in genetic code important 0.87
be in genetic code 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in code important)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in code)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in code)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(redundancy, be important in code)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in code)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be important in genetic code)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(redundancy, be important in genetic code)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be in code)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in code)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be important in code)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be important in genetic code)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in genetic code important)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(redundancy, be in genetic code important)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in code)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(redundancy, be important in genetic code)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in genetic code)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(redundancy, be in genetic code important)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in genetic code important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(redundancy, be in code important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(redundancy, be in code important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(redundancy, be in code important)