redwood: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.68
, conifer
Weight: 0.63
, wood
Weight: 0.56
, park
Weight: 0.51
, type
Weight: 0.48
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.37
, sycamore
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(redwood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(maple tree, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(maple tree, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(redwood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(redwood, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(redwood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(redwood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(redwood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(redwood, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(redwood, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(maple tree, is expensive)