reef: be in zone important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, island
Weight: 0.58
, brand
Weight: 0.51
, beach
Weight: 0.49
Siblings great barrier reef
Weight: 0.82
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.36
, rhode island
Weight: 0.36
, staten island
Weight: 0.36
, long island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in disphotic zone important 1.00
be in zone important 1.00
be in zone 0.97
be in disphotic zone 0.97

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(reef, be in zone important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(reef, be in disphotic zone important)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(reef, be in disphotic zone important)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(reef, be in disphotic zone)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(reef, be in disphotic zone)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(reef, be in disphotic zone)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(reef, be in disphotic zone important)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(reef, be in zone)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(reef, be in zone)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(reef, be in zone)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(reef, be in zone)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(reef, be in disphotic zone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(reef, be in disphotic zone important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(reef, be in zone important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(reef, be in zone important)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(reef, be in zone important)