reef: have biodiversity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.61
, island
Weight: 0.58
, brand
Weight: 0.51
, beach
Weight: 0.49
Siblings great barrier reef
Weight: 0.82
, cayman islands
Weight: 0.36
, rhode island
Weight: 0.36
, staten island
Weight: 0.36
, long island
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
have biodiversity 1.00
have high biodiversity 0.97
be critical to biodiversity 0.94
be critical to biodiversity in oceans 0.92
have endemic species 0.76
is ecotourism site 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(island, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(reef, have biodiversity)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(island, have endemic species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(reef, have biodiversity)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(island, have endemic species)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(island, have high biodiversity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(island, have high biodiversity)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(island, have endemic species)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, is ecotourism site)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(island, have high biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(reef, have biodiversity)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(island, have endemic species) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(reef, have biodiversity)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(great barrier reef, is ecotourism site) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(great barrier reef, is ecotourism site)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(reef, have biodiversity)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(reef, have high biodiversity)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(reef, be critical to biodiversity in oceans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(reef, have biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(island, have endemic species)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(island, have high biodiversity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, is ecotourism site)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(island, have endemic species)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(reef, have biodiversity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(island, have high biodiversity)