ref: be dressed like striped horses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.57
, mistake
Weight: 0.52
, official
Weight: 0.49
, time
Weight: 0.46
, information
Weight: 0.46
Siblings referee
Weight: 0.34
, dvd player
Weight: 0.34
, football player
Weight: 0.33
, baseball player
Weight: 0.32
, winger
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dressed like striped horses 1.00
be dressed like horses 0.95
wear white 0.80
wear white hat 0.79
wear black 0.77
wear stripes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(player, wear white)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(player, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(player, wear white)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(player, wear black)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear stripes)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(referee, wear stripes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(referee, wear stripes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(baseball player, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(baseball player, wear white)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(football player, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(football player, wear black)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(referee, wear white)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(referee, wear black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ref, be dressed like striped horses)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ref, wear stripes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ref, wear stripes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear black)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ref, wear black)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ref, wear white)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ref, wear stripes)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ref, wear white hat)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear stripes)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ref, wear black)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ref, wear white)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ref, wear black)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ref, wear white hat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear white)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(referee, wear stripes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, wear black)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear white)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear black)