ref: has state works

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.57
, mistake
Weight: 0.52
, official
Weight: 0.49
, time
Weight: 0.46
, information
Weight: 0.46
Siblings referee
Weight: 0.34
, dvd player
Weight: 0.34
, football player
Weight: 0.33
, baseball player
Weight: 0.32
, winger
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state works 1.00
work 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(time, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ref, has state works)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(time, work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(time, work)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(time, work) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ref, has state works)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ref, has state works)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ref, work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(ref, work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(ref, work)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ref, work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, has state works)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ref, has state works)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(time, work)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(ref, has state works) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(time, work)