ref: hate chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.57
, mistake
Weight: 0.52
, official
Weight: 0.49
, time
Weight: 0.46
, information
Weight: 0.46
Siblings referee
Weight: 0.34
, dvd player
Weight: 0.34
, football player
Weight: 0.33
, baseball player
Weight: 0.32
, winger
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
hate chicago 1.00
is wayne 0.78
be bad in nba 0.77
be in nba 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(ref, hate chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ref, is wayne)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(ref, be in nba)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(ref, is wayne)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(ref, be in nba)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(ref, is wayne)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ref, be in nba)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ref, be bad in nba)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ref, be bad in nba)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(ref, be bad in nba)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(ref, be bad in nba)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(ref, be in nba)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ref, is wayne)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(ref, hate chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(ref, hate chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ref, hate chicago)