ref: wear white hat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents player
Weight: 0.57
, mistake
Weight: 0.52
, official
Weight: 0.49
, time
Weight: 0.46
, information
Weight: 0.46
Siblings referee
Weight: 0.34
, dvd player
Weight: 0.34
, football player
Weight: 0.33
, baseball player
Weight: 0.32
, winger
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white hat 1.00
wear hat 0.97
wear white 0.91
wear black 0.89
wear stripes 0.83
be dressed like striped horses 0.79
call purple blue 0.79
wear numbers 0.78
throw blue flag 0.76
be called blue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ref, wear white hat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear black)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ref, wear white hat)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(official, wear numbers)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ref, wear white hat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(player, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(player, wear black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(official, wear numbers)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(player, wear white)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(player, wear black)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(official, wear numbers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(baseball player, wear white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(football player, wear black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear stripes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(referee, be called blue)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear numbers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear white)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(player, wear black)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(official, wear numbers)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white hat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(baseball player, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(baseball player, wear white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(referee, wear white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(football player, wear black)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(football player, wear black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(referee, wear black)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(referee, wear stripes)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(referee, wear stripes)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(referee, wear numbers)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(referee, wear numbers)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(referee, be called blue)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, be called blue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(ref, wear white hat)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ref, wear white)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(ref, wear white)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ref, wear black)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(ref, wear black)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ref, wear black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ref, wear stripes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ref, wear stripes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ref, wear stripes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(ref, be dressed like striped horses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(ref, be dressed like striped horses)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ref, wear numbers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(ref, be dressed like striped horses)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(ref, wear numbers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(ref, wear numbers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(ref, call purple blue)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ref, call purple blue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(ref, throw blue flag)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(ref, throw blue flag)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ref, be called blue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ref, be dressed like striped horses)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(ref, call purple blue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(ref, be called blue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ref, throw blue flag)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(ref, be called blue)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(ref, throw blue flag)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(ref, call purple blue)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(ref, be called blue)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear stripes)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear numbers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ref, wear white hat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(official, wear numbers)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear white)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(referee, wear numbers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(referee, wear stripes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, wear white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(baseball player, wear white)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(football player, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, be called blue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear white)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(player, wear black)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(ref, wear white hat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(official, wear numbers)