referee: be at hockey game

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coach
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, captain
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at hockey game 1.00
be at soccer game 0.90
be at football 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coach, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(referee, be at hockey game)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(coach, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(referee, be at hockey game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(coach, be at hockey game)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(coach, be at soccer game)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(coach, be at hockey game)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(coach, be at soccer game)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(coach, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(referee, be at hockey game)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(coach, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(referee, be at hockey game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(soccer ball, be at soccer game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(referee, be at hockey game)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(referee, be at soccer game)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(referee, be at football)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at soccer game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(referee, be at soccer game)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(referee, be at soccer game)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(referee, be at football)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at football)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(referee, be at football)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(referee, be at hockey game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coach, be at hockey game)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(coach, be at soccer game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer ball, be at soccer game)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(soccer ball, be at soccer game)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(coach, be at hockey game)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(referee, be at hockey game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(coach, be at soccer game)