referee: wear white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents official
Weight: 0.62
, coach
Weight: 0.57
, penalty
Weight: 0.57
, person
Weight: 0.56
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ref
Weight: 0.34
, umpire
Weight: 0.32
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.32
, prosecutor
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear white 1.00
wear black 0.97
wear black stripes 0.91
wear black armbands 0.87
wear stripes 0.86
wear socks 0.84
has color black 0.83
wear long socks 0.83
have black uniforms 0.82
wear armbands 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(soccer ball, has color black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(umpire, wear armbands)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(ref, wear stripes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ref, wear white)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(ref, wear white)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(ref, wear black)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(ref, wear black)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(umpire, wear black)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(ref, wear stripes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(ref, wear stripes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(soccer ball, has color black)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(soccer ball, has color black)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(umpire, wear armbands)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(umpire, wear armbands)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear white)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear black)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(referee, wear black stripes)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black stripes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, wear black armbands)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, wear black armbands)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black stripes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(referee, wear stripes)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(referee, wear stripes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(referee, wear black armbands)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(referee, wear stripes)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(referee, has color black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, has color black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(referee, wear long socks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(referee, wear long socks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(referee, have black uniforms)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(referee, have black uniforms)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(referee, has color black)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(referee, wear long socks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(referee, have black uniforms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black stripes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear long socks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear black armbands)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear stripes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(referee, have black uniforms)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(referee, has color black)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(referee, wear white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(ref, wear stripes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(umpire, wear armbands)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ref, wear black)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ref, wear white)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(umpire, wear black)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(referee, wear white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(soccer ball, has color black)