reference: be important in jobs

Related concepts

Parents	clue Weight: 0.63 , illustration Weight: 0.62 , code Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.61
Siblings	dictionary Weight: 0.64 , pronoun Weight: 0.64 , encyclopedia Weight: 0.64 , explanation Weight: 0.64 , subject Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in jobs	1.00
has state jobs	0.92
be important for job	0.86
be needed for job	0.81
be important to employees	0.79
be important to employers	0.79
be important in business	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(reference, be important in jobs)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(illustration, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(reference, be important in jobs)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(code, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(reference, be important in jobs)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(code, be important to employees) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(reference, be important in jobs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(illustration, has state jobs)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(code, be important to employees)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(code, be important in business)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(illustration, has state jobs)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in business)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(code, be important in business)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(code, be important to employees)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(subject, has state jobs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.66

Plausible(illustration, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(reference, be important in jobs)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(factor, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(reference, be important in jobs)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.49

Plausible(code, be important to employees) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(reference, be important in jobs)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(code, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(reference, be important in jobs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(subject, has state jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(subject, has state jobs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Salient(reference, be important in jobs)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(reference, be important for job)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(reference, be needed for job)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(reference, be important for job)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(reference, be needed for job)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(reference, be needed for job)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(reference, be important for job)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(reference, be important to employers)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Salient(reference, be important to employers)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important for job)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(reference, be important to employers)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important to employers)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(reference, be needed for job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

Salient(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.73

Plausible(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(reference, be important in jobs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(code, be important to employees)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(code, be important in business)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(illustration, has state jobs)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(subject, has state jobs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(illustration, has state jobs)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(code, be important to employees)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(code, be important in business)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Typical(reference, be important in jobs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(factor, be important in business)