reference: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents clue
Weight: 0.63
, illustration
Weight: 0.62
, code
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings dictionary
Weight: 0.64
, pronoun
Weight: 0.64
, encyclopedia
Weight: 0.64
, explanation
Weight: 0.64
, subject
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality plus 0.84
is great 0.81
has quality questions 0.76
improve ones confidence 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(clue, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(code, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(code, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(illustration, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(clue, has quality plus)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(illustration, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(code, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(clue, has quality plus)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pronoun, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(dictionary, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dictionary, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(encyclopedia, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(code, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(illustration, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(clue, has quality plus) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(code, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(encyclopedia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(encyclopedia, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dictionary, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(dictionary, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(pronoun, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(pronoun, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(dictionary, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(dictionary, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(explanation, improve ones confidence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(explanation, improve ones confidence)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(reference, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(reference, has quality questions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(reference, has quality questions)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(reference, has quality questions)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality questions)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(reference, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(clue, has quality plus)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(illustration, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(pronoun, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(explanation, improve ones confidence)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(dictionary, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(encyclopedia, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(dictionary, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(code, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(code, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(illustration, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(reference, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(clue, has quality plus)