refined sugar: be cheaper than unrefined

Related concepts

Parents	carbohydrate Weight: 0.66 , product Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.56 , food Weight: 0.55
Siblings	coconut milk Weight: 0.36 , lime juice Weight: 0.35 , milk chocolate Weight: 0.35 , sugar Weight: 0.35 , citric acid Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be cheaper than unrefined	1.00
be worse than unrefined sugar	0.92
is expensive	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Plausible(food, is expensive)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(food, is expensive)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.99

Plausible(food, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(coconut milk, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(coconut milk, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be worse than unrefined sugar)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Salient(refined sugar, be worse than unrefined sugar)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(refined sugar, be worse than unrefined sugar)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(refined sugar, be worse than unrefined sugar)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is expensive)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(refined sugar, is expensive)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(refined sugar, is expensive)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Salient(refined sugar, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.28

Salient(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(product, is expensive)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(coconut milk, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(product, is expensive)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(food, is expensive)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.49

Typical(refined sugar, be cheaper than unrefined) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)