refined sugar: is quality

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents carbohydrate
Weight: 0.66
, product
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, food
Weight: 0.55
Siblings coconut milk
Weight: 0.36
, lime juice
Weight: 0.35
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.35
, sugar
Weight: 0.35
, citric acid
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is quality 1.00
has quality bad 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is quality)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(citric acid, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sugar, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(food, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(citric acid, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(citric acid, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(sugar, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sugar, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(coconut milk, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(coconut milk, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(refined sugar, is quality)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(refined sugar, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(refined sugar, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(refined sugar, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(citric acid, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(coconut milk, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sugar, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(refined sugar, is quality)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(food, has quality bad)