reflex: be improved

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, process
Weight: 0.50
, publication
Weight: 0.46
, quality
Weight: 0.45
Siblings swallowing
Weight: 0.52
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.34
, immune response
Weight: 0.33
, simple function
Weight: 0.32
, digestion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be improved 1.00
be increased 0.80
has state improvement 0.79
improve with practice 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(reflex, be improved)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, has state improvement)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(reflex, be improved)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(reflex, be improved)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(quality, be improved)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(quality, be increased)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(process, has state improvement)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(quality, be improved)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(quality, be increased)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(process, has state improvement)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(digestion, be improved)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(quality, be improved)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reflex, be improved)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(process, has state improvement)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reflex, be improved)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(quality, be increased)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(reflex, be improved)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(digestion, be improved)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(digestion, be improved)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(reflex, be improved)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(reflex, improve with practice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(reflex, improve with practice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(reflex, improve with practice)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(reflex, improve with practice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(reflex, be improved)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(process, has state improvement)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(digestion, be improved)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be improved)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(quality, be increased)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(reflex, be improved)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(process, has state improvement)