reflexivity: be important in qualitative research

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.51
, element
Weight: 0.50
, relation
Weight: 0.41
, device
Weight: 0.37
, property
Weight: 0.37
Siblings theory
Weight: 0.32
, repetition
Weight: 0.31
, principle
Weight: 0.31
, concept
Weight: 0.31
, ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in qualitative research 1.00
be important in qualitative research pdf 0.95
be important in qualitativ research 0.90
be important in research 0.90
be important in research pdf 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research pdf)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research pdf)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research pdf)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research pdf)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in research pdf)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in research pdf)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(reflexivity, be important in research pdf)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in research pdf)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitative research)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in research)