reflexivity: be important in work

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.51
, element
Weight: 0.50
, relation
Weight: 0.41
, device
Weight: 0.37
, property
Weight: 0.37
Siblings theory
Weight: 0.32
, repetition
Weight: 0.31
, principle
Weight: 0.31
, concept
Weight: 0.31
, ideology
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in work 1.00
be important in social work 0.87
be important in qualitativ research 0.79
be important in research 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(theory, be important in research)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(theory, be important in social work)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in social work)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(theory, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(theory, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in work)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in social work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in social work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(reflexivity, be important in social work)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in social work)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(reflexivity, be important in research)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(reflexivity, be important in qualitativ research)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(reflexivity, be important in work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(theory, be important in social work)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(reflexivity, be important in work)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(theory, be important in research)