regeneration: occur geography

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents function
Weight: 0.58
, ability
Weight: 0.54
, concept
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.53
Siblings development
Weight: 0.32
, transformation
Weight: 0.32
, digestion
Weight: 0.31
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.31
, trigonometric function
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
occur geography 1.00
is geography 0.92
is important geography 0.91
occur 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(digestion, occur)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(development, occur)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(transformation, occur)
0.00
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(photosynthesis, occur)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(transformation, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(transformation, occur)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(photosynthesis, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(photosynthesis, occur)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(development, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(development, occur)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(digestion, occur) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(digestion, occur)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(regeneration, occur geography)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(regeneration, is geography)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, is geography)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, is important geography)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(regeneration, occur)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(regeneration, occur)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(regeneration, is geography)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(regeneration, is important geography)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(regeneration, occur)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(regeneration, is important geography)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(regeneration, is important geography)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(regeneration, is geography)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(regeneration, occur geography)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(transformation, occur)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(development, occur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(digestion, occur)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regeneration, occur geography) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(photosynthesis, occur)