region: have warmer climates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
have warmer climates 1.00
be with warmer climates 1.00
be with warmer climates poorer 0.95
have climates 0.93
be with warmer climates typically poorer 0.93
be with climates 0.93
be with climates poorer 0.88
be with climates typically poorer 0.86
have different climate 0.83
have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, have warmer climates)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(region, have different climate)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(region, have different climate)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(region, have different climate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(region, have different climate)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)