region: is densely populated

Related concepts

Parents	country Weight: 0.69 , factor Weight: 0.60 , financial institution Weight: 0.59 , province Weight: 0.59
Siblings	south carolina Weight: 0.71 , east asia Weight: 0.70 , north dakota Weight: 0.67 , south Weight: 0.65 , west Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is densely populated	1.00
is sparsely populated	0.90
is populated	0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(east asia, is densely populated)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Remarkable(east asia, is populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(east asia, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(east asia, is densely populated)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

Remarkable(east asia, is populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(east asia, is populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(region, is densely populated)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(region, is populated)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(region, is sparsely populated)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.97

Remarkable(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(region, is populated)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Plausible(region, is populated)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.04

Typical(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(region, is sparsely populated)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(region, is populated)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(region, is sparsely populated)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(region, is sparsely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.51

Salient(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(region, is densely populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Plausible(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(region, is densely populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(east asia, is densely populated)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(region, is densely populated) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(east asia, is populated)