region: more than polar regions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.69
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, financial institution
Weight: 0.59
, province
Weight: 0.59
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.71
, east asia
Weight: 0.70
, north dakota
Weight: 0.67
, south
Weight: 0.65
, west
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
more than polar regions 1.00
have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes 0.86
be with warmer climates typically poorer 0.79
be with warmer climates poorer 0.79
be with warmer climates 0.78
have warmer climates 0.78
be with climates typically poorer 0.77
be with climates poorer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(region, more than polar regions)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(region, have warmer climates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(region, have more consistent climate than regions at middle latitudes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(region, have warmer climates)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(region, be with warmer climates typically poorer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(region, have warmer climates)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(region, have warmer climates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(region, more than polar regions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(region, more than polar regions)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(region, more than polar regions)