regulation: be important in banking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in banking 1.00
affect banking 0.95
be concerned about shadow banking 0.84
be important in finance 0.80
be in financial system 0.77
be important in business 0.77
be important in healthcare 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in healthcare)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(legislation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(legislation, be important in healthcare)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in healthcare)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in banking)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(regulation, affect banking)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(regulation, affect banking)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(regulation, affect banking)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, affect banking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(regulation, be in financial system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in healthcare)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(regulation, be in financial system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(regulation, be in financial system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in healthcare)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in finance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in healthcare)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in business)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in business)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be in financial system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in business)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in healthcare)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in finance)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in banking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in healthcare)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(regulator, be concerned about shadow banking)