regulation: be important in finance

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in finance 1.00
be important in banking 0.80
be important in business 0.77
affect banking 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(legislation, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in finance)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in banking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in business)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(regulation, affect banking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(regulation, affect banking)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in banking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in business)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in banking)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(regulation, affect banking)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in banking)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(regulation, affect banking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in finance)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in finance)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in business)