regulation: be important in scientific workplace

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in scientific workplace 1.00
be important in workplace 0.90
be important in research 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, be important in research)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be important in workplace)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(legislation, be important in workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(legislation, be important in workplace)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(interpretation, be important in research) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(interpretation, be important in research)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in scientific workplace)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in workplace)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in workplace)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(regulation, be important in workplace)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(regulation, be important in workplace)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in scientific workplace)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(regulation, be important in scientific workplace)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(legislation, be important in workplace)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be important in scientific workplace) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(interpretation, be important in research)