regulation: be made in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be made in france 1.00
be made in spain 0.85
be made in denmark 0.82
be made in canada 0.80
be in india 0.77
was good for america 0.76
be passed in india 0.75
be in india referred 0.75
be in india referred to 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(regulation, be made in france)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good for america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good for america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(period, be in india)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(period, be in india referred)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(period, be in india referred to)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(legislation, be passed in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(prohibition, was good for america)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(regulation, be made in france)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(period, be in india)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(period, be in india)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(legislation, be passed in india)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(legislation, be passed in india)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(period, be in india referred)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(period, be in india referred)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(period, be in india referred to)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(period, be in india referred to)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(regulation, be made in france)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(regulation, be made in denmark)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(regulation, be made in denmark)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(regulation, be made in denmark)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(regulation, be made in canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(regulation, be made in canada)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in denmark)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, be made in spain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(regulation, be made in spain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(regulation, be made in canada)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(regulation, be made in spain)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in spain)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(regulation, be made in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good for america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(period, be in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(legislation, be passed in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(period, be in india referred)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(period, be in india referred to)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(regulation, be made in france)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good for america)