regulation: is good thing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good thing 1.00
is thing 0.95
was good 0.85
is really light 0.80
is really late 0.79
was bad 0.79
has quality good 0.78
is weird 0.77
is right called 0.76
is terrible 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(prohibition, is thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prohibition, was good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(prohibition, is thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(prohibition, was good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(protection, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, was bad)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(protection, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, is good thing)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, is thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(period, is right called)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mandate, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(prohibition, is thing)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(prohibition, was good)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prohibition, was bad)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(protection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(regulation, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(legislation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(legislation, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(interpretation, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(interpretation, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mandate, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(mandate, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(period, is right called)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(period, is right called)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(regulation, is good thing)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(regulation, is thing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is thing)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(regulation, is thing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(regulation, is thing)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(regulation, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(regulation, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(regulation, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(regulation, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(regulation, is good thing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(prohibition, is thing)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prohibition, is good thing)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(legislation, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(period, is right called)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(interpretation, has quality good)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(mandate, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(prohibition, is thing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prohibition, is good thing)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(prohibition, was bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(protection, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(regulation, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(prohibition, was good)