regulation: protect rivers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents measure
Weight: 0.64
, protection
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.62
, prohibition
Weight: 0.62
Siblings mandate
Weight: 0.65
, period
Weight: 0.59
, interpretation
Weight: 0.59
, regulator
Weight: 0.57
, legislation
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect rivers 1.00
protect oceans 0.82
protect fish populations in oceans 0.82
water 0.76
affect streams 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(interpretation, water)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(interpretation, water) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(interpretation, water)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(regulation, protect rivers)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(regulation, protect fish populations in oceans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(regulation, protect fish populations in oceans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(regulation, protect fish populations in oceans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(regulation, protect fish populations in oceans)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(regulation, protect oceans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(regulation, protect oceans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(regulation, protect oceans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(regulation, protect oceans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(regulation, protect rivers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(regulation, protect rivers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(regulation, protect rivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(interpretation, water)