regulator: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents regulation
Weight: 0.57
, financial institution
Weight: 0.57
, gene
Weight: 0.56
, person
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.54
Siblings fed
Weight: 0.51
, mortgage lender
Weight: 0.33
, online banking
Weight: 0.33
, banking
Weight: 0.33
, bank statement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(online banking, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(banking, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(banking, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(banking, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(online banking, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(online banking, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(regulator, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulator, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(regulator, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(banking, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(regulator, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(online banking, has quality better)