rehabilitation: be associated with school

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents treatment
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.63
, care
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hospital care
Weight: 0.35
, restoration
Weight: 0.34
, dialysis
Weight: 0.34
, surgery
Weight: 0.33
, plastic surgery
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be associated with school 1.00
be important in school 0.82
be associated with school of criminology 0.82
be associated with weather 0.81
be associated with positivist school 0.81
be related 0.78
be associated with positivist school of criminology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(project, be important in school)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(area, be related)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(project, be important in school)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(area, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(project, be important in school)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(area, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(project, be important in school)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(area, be related)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school of criminology)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with positivist school of criminology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(project, be important in school)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(area, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(project, be important in school)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(rehabilitation, be associated with school)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(area, be related)