reimbursement: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents amount
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.59
, claim
Weight: 0.59
, condition
Weight: 0.58
Siblings health insurance
Weight: 0.33
, escort service
Weight: 0.33
, hospital care
Weight: 0.32
, postal service
Weight: 0.32
, tuition
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
is quality 0.91
has quality right 0.90
improve quality 0.84
improve quality of education 0.81
be bad in bulgaria 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(claim, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(claim, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(claim, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuition, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(tuition, improve quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(claim, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tuition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(tuition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(tuition, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(health insurance, has quality right) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(health insurance, has quality right)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(tuition, improve quality of education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(tuition, improve quality of education)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(reimbursement, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(reimbursement, has quality bad)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality bad)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(reimbursement, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(reimbursement, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(claim, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality right)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(tuition, improve quality of education)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tuition, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(health insurance, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(claim, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(reimbursement, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)