rejection: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.62
, emotion
Weight: 0.59
, complication
Weight: 0.59
, feeling
Weight: 0.58
Siblings denial
Weight: 0.34
, heart failure
Weight: 0.34
, renal failure
Weight: 0.33
, congestive heart failure
Weight: 0.33
, disappointment
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
feel good 0.80
is good thing 0.78
have good side 0.78
has quality question 0.77
has quality advantage 0.77
get best 0.76
has quality definition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(feeling, feel good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(emotion, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(emotion, feel good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(emotion, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(complication, has quality question)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(feeling, feel good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(emotion, is good thing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(emotion, feel good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(feeling, feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(emotion, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(complication, has quality question)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(denial, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(feeling, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(feeling, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(feeling, feel good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(emotion, feel good)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(emotion, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(complication, has quality question)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(denial, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(disappointment, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(heart failure, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(disappointment, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, is good thing)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, have good side)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(disappointment, have good side)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(disappointment, have good side)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(denial, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(denial, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(rejection, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(rejection, feel good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(rejection, feel good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(rejection, feel good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(rejection, feel good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(rejection, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(rejection, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(rejection, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(feeling, feel good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(emotion, feel good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(emotion, is good thing)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(denial, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(disappointment, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(heart failure, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(denial, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(disappointment, is good thing)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(disappointment, have good side)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(complication, has quality question)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(feeling, feel good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(emotion, feel good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(feeling, has quality wrong)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(rejection, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(emotion, is good thing)