relation: be in egypt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.57
, account
Weight: 0.57
, condition
Weight: 0.55
, third party
Weight: 0.53
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.61
, identity
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.57
, term
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in egypt 1.00
go in egypt 0.97
be with canada in russia 0.79
were for african americans 0.78
be in germany 0.77
survive in uk england 0.77
were in japan different from conditions in germany 0.77
be between israel 0.77
be in russia 0.77
be with venezuela 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be in egypt)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be in egypt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(third party, survive in uk england)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(third party, survive in uk england)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(servant, go in egypt)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(friendship, be in russia)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(third party, survive in uk england)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(relation, be in egypt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(servant, go in egypt)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(servant, go in egypt)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(friendship, be in russia)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(friendship, be in russia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(relation, be in egypt)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(relation, be between israel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(relation, be with venezuela)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(relation, be with venezuela)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(relation, be with venezuela)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(relation, be with venezuela)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(relation, be between israel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(relation, be with canada in russia)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(relation, be between israel)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(relation, be between israel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(relation, be in egypt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(servant, go in egypt)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(friendship, be in russia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(third party, survive in uk england)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(relation, be in egypt)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(condition, were in japan different from conditions in germany)